Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26839 (CHH)

SMT. PRIYANKA TIWARI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/5136/2023 · 2025-04-24

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:18688 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 5136 of 2023 1 - Smt. Priyanka Tiwari W/o Bharat Bhusan Tiwari, Aged About 32 Years Working As Data Entry Operator, Land- Records Department Tahsil Office Dongargarh, R/o Kedarbadi, Ward No. 3, Dongergarh, District Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Revenue Department, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Director Land Records, Chhattisgarh Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Shri Awadhesh Kumar Chowdhari Aged About 35 Years Assistant Programmer, Posted At Commissioner Land Records Office (Chhattisgarh) Nava Raipur, Raipur 4 - Shri Neeraj Chandrawanshi S/o Rupendra Chandrawanshi, Aged About 32 Years Assistant Programmer, Posted At Commissioner Land Records Office (Chhattisgarh) Nava Raipur, Raipur. 5 - Shri Naveen Prakash Sen, S/o Prem Lal Sen, Aged About 40 Years SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.04.24 18:38:49 +0530 2 / 2 Assistant Programmer, Posted At Commissioner Land Records Office (Chhattisgarh) Nava Raipur, Raipur 6 - Shri Kalaram S/o Dawan Singh Aged About 36 Years Assistant Programmer Posted At Commissioner Land Records Office (C.G.) Nava Raipur, Raipur. 7 - Shri Rahul Singh Khatriya S/o Gajadhar Singh Khatriya Aged About 32 Years Assistant Programmer Posted At Commissioner Land Records Office (C.G.) Nava Raipur, Raipur. ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : None For Respondents/ State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, Panel Lawyer (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 24/04/2025 1. On repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to prosecute the matter. Since no one is appearing, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar