Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26838 (RAJ)

KAMLESH S/O POORANMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9796/2024 · 2025-01-24

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3606] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9796/2024 Kamlesh S/o Pooranmal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Mundali, Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Veerendra Prajapat Ms. Karishma Soni For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 24/01/2025 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No. 280/2023 registered at Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 332, 353, 307 and 427 of IPC, the petitioner has preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Allegation against the petitioner are not specific and is omnibus in nature. There is no dangerous to life injury to any of the police officials and main allegation of running over the vehicle is against other co- accused Mahendra Takhar and Surendra who have already been enlarged on regular by the trial court. He further submits that the accused-petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation. He prays that the anticipatory bail of accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application. [2025:RJ-JP:3606] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9796/2024] 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the fact that main allegation of causing hinderous to the police official is performing their duty is against Mahendra Takhar and Surendra, specific act to run over the vehicle are against Mahendra Takhar and Surendra. Injuries sustained to the police officials are not dangerous to life. Co-accused has already been granted indulgence of bail by trial court itself, therefore, without expressing anything on merits / demerits of the case and looking to the fact that custodial investigation of the present petitioner is not required, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Kamlesh S/o Pooranmal, in connection with FIR No. 280/2023 registered at Police Station Renwal, District Jaipur Rural he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /200