Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26835 (RAJ)

SANWARMAL v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/4997/2011 · 2025-08-28

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34484] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4997/2011 Sanwarmal S/o Shri Kana Ram, aged about 46 years, resident of Bharonda Kala, Tehsil & District Jhunjhunu ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5028/2011 Mani Ram S/o Shri Arjun Singh, aged about 39 years, resident of Village & Post Dhigal Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5032/2011 Birbal Singh S/o Shri Dhanna Ram, aged about 43 years, resident of Ranjeerpura, Tehsil and District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General of Police, Police Head Quarter, Jaipur. 3. Superintendent of Police, Jhunjhunu. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Saxena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Somitra Chaturvedi, Dy. GC with Mr. Munendra Singh Fauzdar Mr. Sheetanshu Sharma with Mr. Tanay Goyal for Mr. Rajendra Prasad, Advocate General [2025:RJ-JP:34484] (2 of 2) [CW-4997/2011] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 28/08/2025 Learned counsel for the respondents, at the outset has stated that suspension order in question has already been invoked by the respondents. In view of above statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, no cause of action for pursuing the writ petitions survives. Hence, writ petitions filed by the petitioners are dismissed as having become infructuous. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /88-90