IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.16520 of 2024 Decided on: 10th January, 2025 _________________________________________________________________ Anju Bala ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocates General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the legal issue involved in the case has already been adjudicated upon; Petitioner has filed representation dated 08.09.2024 (Annexure P-4) for the redressal of her grievances 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes - 2 - raised in the writ petition, but till date the same has not been adjudicated upon; Petitioner would be satisfied in case competent authority is directed to decide the representation in accordance with law within a time bound schedule. The above is not objected to by learned Additional Advocate General. 3. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondents/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge January 10, 2025 R.Atal