Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26833 (ALL)

PAWAN SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WTAX/816/2025 · 2025-04-20

Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:59801-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 816 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pawan Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Trivedi,Rahul Trivedi Counsel for Respondent :- Abhinava Krishna Srivastava,C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the objection dated October 25, 2024 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed the aforesaid objection before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the aforesaid objection of the petitioner should be decided by the authority concerned expeditiously. 5. Accordingly, the authority concerned is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid objection of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from date after granting an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file all documents during the personal hearing, which may be taken into consideration. 6. With the above directions, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 21.4.2025 Kuldeep (Dr. Y. K. Srivastava, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad