- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21967 RSA No. 1183 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1183 OF 2023 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O LATE SRI VENKATANARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS 2. SRI. NARASIMHAMURHTY S/O LATE SRI VENKATANARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 3. SRI MANJUNATH RAO S/O LATE SRI VENKATANARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS APPELLANTS 1 TO 3 ARE RESIDING AT ADDE VISWANATHAPURA VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, ARIKERE POST, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU 4. SMT. SAROJAMMA D/O LATE SRI VENKATANARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS 5. SMT. NAGAMANI D/O LATE SRI VENKATANARASAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS APPELLANTS 4 AND 5 ARE RESIDING AT Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21967 RSA No. 1183 of 2023 ADDE VISWANATHAPURA VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI, ARIKERE POST, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU 6. SMT BHAGYAMMA D/O LATE SRI VENKATANARASAIAH, W/O SRI MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS R/AT MANDUR VILLAGE AND POST , BENGALURU NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU …APPELLANTS (BY SRI MUNIRAJU M, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI C NARAYANA REDDY S/O LATE SRI CHINNAPPA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS R/O ITTAKALPURA VILLAGE HESARAGHATTA HOBLI BENGALURU NORTH TALUK BENGALURU …RESPONDENT (BY SRI RAMAIAH GOWDA L M, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.04.2023 PASSED IN R.A.NO.30/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU AND ETC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21967 RSA No. 1183 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT The appellants and the respondent along with their respective counsel are present before the Court. 2. The parties have filed the compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3 of CPC and affixed their signatures in the compromise petition and the same has been identified by the respective counsel. In terms of the compromise, the appellants have agreed to execute the sale deed in favour of the respondent by receiving a total sale consideration of Rs.1,50,00,000/-. In terms of the compromise, Rs.5,00,000/- is given in favour of appellant No.1 –Smt. Nagamma by way of Demand Draft bearing No.244448 dated 25.04.2025; Rs.63,50,000/- is given in favour of appellant No.2 – Sri Narasimhamurthy by way of Demand Draft bearing No.244444 dated 25.04.2025; Rs.65,00,000/- is given in favour of appellant No.3 – Sri Manjunatha Rao by way of Demand Draft bearing No.244445 dated 25.04.2025; Rs.5,00,000/- is given in favour of appellant No.4 – Smt. Sarojamma by way of - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21967 RSA No. 1183 of 2023 Demand Draft bearing No.244450 dated 25.04.2025; Rs.5,00,000/- is given in favour of appellant No.5 – Smt. Nagamani by way of Demand Draft bearing No.244449 dated 25.04.2025; Rs.5,00,000/- is given in favour of appellant No.6 – Smt. Bhagyamma @ Bhagyalakshmi by way of Demand Draft bearing No.244451 dated 25.04.2025 and all the Demand Drafts are drawn on IDBI Bank, Banaswadi Branch, Bengaluru and Rs.1,50,000/- was paid by way of cash in favour of appellant No.2 – Narasimha Murthy. 3. The parties have understood the terms of the compromise. Hence, compromise petition is accepted. Accordingly, the appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise taken place between the parties. 4. Registry is directed to draw decree accordingly. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN