Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:80112 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7254 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramcharitr Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Aradhana Singh,Ravi Pratap Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi,C.S.C. Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent, as well as, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that revision of the petitioner has been rejected by the impugned order. He submits that private respondent had applied for mutation of the land in question arising out of the sale-deed of the year 1997 and the mutation was applied in the year 2013. The mutation was rejected against which appeal was filed by the private respondent and the appeal was allowed. Aggrieved by the aforesaid by the aforesaid order, petitioner filed a revision, however, the same has been rejected. 3. It is admitted case of the parties that the land belongs to the government and the petitioner is claiming possessionary right on the land in question. If the petitioner is claiming possessionary rights then the remedy lies with the petitioner to seek declaration and the mutation proceedings being summary in nature shall abide by the decision under the declaratory proceedings. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek declaration of his rights, in accordance with law. Order Date :- 15.5.2025 S.Prakash Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad