Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26827 (RAJ)

ANKIT S/O PAPPU LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9966/2025 · 2025-09-09

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36287] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9966/2025 1. Ankit S/o Pappu Lal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Aakodiya, Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). 2. Lakhpat S/o Sitaram, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Kiro Ki Dhani, Padhana, Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/09/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused-petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No. 230/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawaimadhopur, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61(2)(a) and 111(2)(b) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act and Section 13 of RPGO. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the offences alleged against the accused- petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate. The accused- [2025:RJ-JP:36287] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9966/2025] petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the offences alleged against the accused-petitioners are exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Ankit S/o Pappu Lal, and 2. Lakhpat S/o Sitaram, in connection with FIR No. 230/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Sawaimadhopur, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided both of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/68