1 2025:CGHC:1171 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 108 of 2023 1. U.A Farooqui S/o R. A. Siddiqui Aged About 55 Years Posted As Sub Engineer, Office Of Engineer In Chief, Public Works, Atal Nagar Raipur, R/o P-4, Adarsh Nagar, Durg District- Durg Chhattisgarh 2. Sunil Chandra Sharma S/o Late Shri Hriday Lal Sharma Aged About 56 Years Posted As Sub Engineer, Office Of Managing Director, C G R I D C L Division Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Ajay Kumar Mahale S/o Shri G. L Mahale Aged About 60 Years Posted As Sub Engineer, Office Of Executive Engineer Public Works Department, Division Durg District - Durg Chhattisgarh 4. Sagar Kumar Sahu S/o Shri P. R Sahu Aged About 57 Years Posted As Sub Engineer, Office Of Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division Bemetara, District -Bemetara, Chhattisgarh 5. Uday Ram Patel S/o Sundarmani Patel Aged About 59 Years Posted As Sub Engineer, Office Of Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division Durg, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh 6. Rakesh Kumar Shukla S/o Late Shri Kailash Narayan Shukla Aged About 56 Years Posted As Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sub Division Patan, Division Durg, District - Durg, Chhattisgarh 7. Ravindra Kela S/o Late Shri D. R. Kela Aged About 56 Years Posted As Sub Divisional Officer, Public Works Department, Sub Division Bilaspur, District -Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Public Works Department, Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. The Engineer In Chief Public Works Department, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. Director Treasury, Finance And Pension Department, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) 2 (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Anup Majumdar, Advocate For State : Mr. Rajeev Bharat, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 08 .01.2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioners have sought the following relief(s):- It is therefore prayed that, order dated 25/04/2023 passed in writ petition WP(S) no. 7678/2022 may kindly be Re-called and the writ petition WP(S) no. 7678/2022 may be restored to its original number for hearing on merits. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners had claimed consequential benefits and revised pay scale from 1990. He would further submit that though the gradation list was modified by the State Government, but with regard to other benefits, his claim still survives. He would also submit that Junior Counsel could not point out these facts and therefore, WPS No. 7678 of 2022 was disposed of along with the connected matters. Thus, he would pray to re-call the order dated 25.04.2023 passed in WPS No. 7678 of 2022 and to restore the writ petition to its original number. 3. On the other hand, Mr. Rajeev Bharat, Government Advocate appearing for the State would submit that after recording the contention made by Mr. Harsh Tripathi, Advocate, WPS No. 7678 of 2022 and other connected matters were disposed of. 4. Heard. 5. Taking into consideration the fact that the claim of the petitioners still survives; therefore, I am inclined to allow this Review Petition. The order passed in WPS No. 7678 of 2022 dated 25.04.2023 pertaining to the 3 petitioners is hereby re-called. The writ petition (WPS No. 7678 of 2022) is hereby restored to its original number. 6. With the aforesaid observation(s), the instant petition is hereby allowed. d Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant