[2025:RJ-JP:33053] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9960/2025 Pintu Khariya S/o Nemichand, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Ratali Johadi, Purohit Ka Bas, Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar (Raj.). (At Present At Confined In District Jail, Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10392/2025 Pramod @ Motu @ Mukandchandra S/o Shri Ranveer, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ward No. 17, Pirali, Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Fatehchand Saini Mr. Anil Kumar with Mr. Pradeep Bochaliya For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/08/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.89/2025 registered at Police Station Dadiya, District Sikar (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4) & 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. [2025:RJ-JP:33053] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9960/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submit that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Petitioners are in custody since their date of arrest and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners- (1) Pintu Khariya S/o Nemichand & (2) Pramod @ Motu @ Mukandchandra S/o Shri Ranveer shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:33053] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9960/2025] 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /196-197