DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. SOMNATH SANYAL AND 6 ORS.
Crl.L.P./1/2021 · 2025-11-23
Shamima Jahan
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26818 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26818 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010194232020
2025:GAU-AS:15935
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.L.P./1/2021 DIRECTOR, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THROUGH HEAD OF BRANCH, ANTI-CORRUPTION BRANCH, OPP.- BALAJI TEMPLE, BETKUCHI, GUWAHATI- 781035. VERSUS SOMNATH SANYAL AND 6 ORS.
SON OF LATE KRISHNA KAMAL SANYAL, R/O- 15, BABUGANJ, P.S.
HASANGANJ, LUCHNOW- 20 (UP).
2:SABIR KUMAR CHAKRABORTY S/O- LATE SUDHIR KUMAR CHAKRABORTY R/O- P-517 JAIGIRGHAT 1 NO. BACHHARPARA THAKURPUKUR KOLKATA- 700063.
3:S. N. JAYRAJAN S/O- LATE NARAYAN PILLAI P.S. VATTIYOOR KAVU THIRUVANNANTHAPURAM.
4:PREMANGSHU PAUL CHOUDHURY S/O- LATE PRITHWISH PAUL CHOUDHURY P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM 5:KAUSHIK DEY BISWAS S/O- LATE FATIK DEY BISWAS P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR
Page No.# 2/3 DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM 6:PIJUS KANTI DAS S/O- LATE PRITI BHUSAN DAS P.O. AND PS. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR 7:KAMLESH DEY BISWAS S/O- LATE FATIK DEY BISWAS P.O. AND P.S. SILCHAR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : SC, CBI, MR. S C KEYAL Advocate for the Respondent : MS D HAZARIKA (R-3,4), MS D HAZARIKA R-1,MS P K DARJEE R-1,MR. D K DAS (R-1,3,4)
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN
ORDER Date : 24.11.2025
Heard Ms. N. Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Ms. G. D. Choudhury,
learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Ms. N. Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicant submits that the connected petition for condonation of delay i. e. I.A. No. 7/2021 was dismissed vide order dated 26.09.2025 and as such, the other application also gets infructuous with the same and as such the instant matter is wrongly listed.
3. Submission is accepted.
4. The case, i.e. unregistered Crl. Appeal as well as Crl. L.P. are wrongly listed for orders, as the same should have been closed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant