APHC010379682015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 32552/2015 Between: 1. SHAIK VANNISHA BEE BI W/O. LATE SHAIK, MASTHAN SAHEB AGE:55 YEARS, R/O. KRISHNAYAPALEM, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. SHAIK MASTHAN S/O.SHAIK MAHABOOB AGE:35 YEARS,, M/S. VANNISHA BEE BI, R/O. KRISHNAYAPALEM, TADEPALLIGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SUPPLIES, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AT HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI I:)ISTRICT, ELURU. 3. THE ASSISTANT GRAIN PURCHASING OFFICER TANUKU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ or order more particularly one in the 2 VS,J W.P.No.32552 of 2015 nature of Writ of Madnamus declaring the order of the 2nd respondent Dt:9-12-2013 made in ROC.No.CS-I/123/ECA/2013 as modified by the I Addl., District Judge, West Godavari At Eluru, in CMA.No. 3 of 2014 Dt:07-04-2015 in so far as it is against the petitioners, as illegal arbitrary and coinsequently set aside the order of the 2nd respondent Dt:9- 12- 2013 made in ROC.No.CS-I/123/ECA/2013 as modified by the I Addl., District Judge, West Godavari At Eluru, in CMA.No. 3 of 2014 Dt:07-04- 2015 and to pass such other order or orders as this Hontle Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 42063 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in pursuance of the order of the 2nd respondent dated 9.12.2013 made in Roc.No.CS- I/123/ECA/2013 as modified by the I Addl.District Judge, West Godavari at Eluru, in CMA. o.3 of 2014 dated 7.4.201 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP 3788 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt. 06.10.2015, made in WPMP No. 42063/15, in WP No. 32552/15. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES (AP) The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.32552 of 2015 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 32552/2015 ORDER: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “..to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Madnamus declaring the order of the 2nd respondent Dt.9.12.2013 made in ROC.No.CSI/123/ECA/2013 as modified by the I Addl District Judge, West Godavari At Eluru, in CMA No.3 of 2014 Dt.07.04.2015 in so far as it is against the petitioners, as illegal arbitrary and consequently set aside the order of the 2nd respondent Dt.9.12.2013 made in ROC.No.CSI/123/ECA/2013 as modified by the I Addl District Judge, West Godavari At Eluru in CMA No.3 of 2014 Dt.07.04.2015 and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2. When the matter came up for admission on 06.10.2015, this Court passed the following interim order:- “It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that earlier the petitioner furnished the Bank Guarantee for 100% value of the stock seized and now the 1st Additional District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru, in C.M.A.No.3/2014, modified the order of the District Collector by reducing the percentage of confiscation of stock from 100% to 40%. In the said circumstances, the learned counsel seeks permission to furnish the bank guarantee to the extent of 40% of the confiscated stock during the pendency of the writ petition. In view of the above facts, the petitioner is permitted to furnish a bank guarantee to the extent of 40% (instead of 4 VS,J W.P.No.32552 of 2015 100%) of the seized stock during the pendency of the writ petition.” 3. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies representing the respondents, has furnished copy of the proceedings of the Collector, West Godavari, Eluru, dated 17.09.2014, wherein it is stated that in pursuance of the orders passed by this Court on 06.10.2015, the petitioner has furnished Bank guarantee to the extent of 40% of the seized stock and thereafter, the respondents have handed over the seized stock to the petitioners under proper acknowledgment. 4. Recording the same, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause survives. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________ ___ V. SUJATHA, J Dt.03.09.2025 JLV