IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16402 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-233 Year-2024 Thana- AMAS District- Gaya ====================================================== Shahid Khan Son of Nasruddin Khan Resident of Village- Karmauni, P.S.- Dobhi, District- Gaya, ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP For the Informant : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4 23-07-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Amas P.S. Case No. 233 of 2024 registered for the offence under Sections 111, 109, 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 25(1-b)a, 26, 35, 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and other co-accused persons are said to have shot at the victim and tried to kill him in the Court campus while the victim was in custody. The petitioner is accused in seventeen cases as per the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been acquitted in ten cases and seven cases are Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16402 of 2025(4) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 still pending. The petitioner is in custody since 09.12.2024. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for the informant has assured this Court that the informant will produce the witnesses on the date fixed so that the trial is not delayed as and when the charges are framed. 6. It appears that the petitioner is a dreaded criminal of that area and he has tried to kill the victim in judicial custody. 7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 8. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is hereby rejected. 9. The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Gaya is directed to ensure the commitment of the case so that the trial of such dreaded criminal is not delayed. anand/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T