Sri Jiban Krishna Banik v. Tripura Gramin Bank and Others
WA/105/2025 · 2026-04-06
Biswajit Palit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 268 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 268 (TRI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA _A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A_
WA No. 105 of 2025
Sri. Jiban Krishna Banik, Son of late Rakhal Chandra Banik, resident of Town Pratapgarh, Central Road Extension, P.O. Agartala, P.S. East Agartala, District-West Tripura, PIN- 799001, aged about 68 years. ………Appellant(s) -V E R S U S-
1. Tripura Gramin Bank, a Government Undertaking, represented by its Chairman, having his office at Abhoynagar, Agartala, District- West Tripura, PIN-799005.
2. The Chairman, Tripura Gramin Bank, a Government Undertaking, represented by its Chairman, having his office at Abhoynagar, Agartala, District- West Tripura, PIN-799005.
3. The Board of Directors, Tripura Gramin Bank, Abhoynagar, Agartala, District- West Tripura, PIN-799005. ..…….Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Somik Deb, Sr. Advocte, Mr. Jishan Samed, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prabir Saha, Advocate.
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT =O=R=D=E=R= 06/04/2026
Counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the Appeal with liberty to avail the appellate remedy provided in the applicable service regulations against the impugned order of punishment. Granting liberty, as sought, this Writ Appeal is disposed of. In view of the fact that the proceedings have been pending before the Single Judge and this Bench after the impugned order of punishment has been passed, the Appellate Authority shall entertain the appeal ignoring the period of the limitation prescribed for filing the appeal.
(BISWAJIT PALIT, J) (M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, CJ)
Manti D/B SIDDHARTH A LODH Digitally signed by SIDDHARTHA LODH Date: 2026.04.07 13:46:59 +05'30'