Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2679 (KAR)

VEERAVVA @ IRAVVA W/O. VIRUPAKSHAPPA WALI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY

WP/75105/2013 · 2025-04-29

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7034 WP No. 75105 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO.75105 OF 2013 (LR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VEERAVVA @ IRAVVA W/O. VIRUPAKSHAPPA WALI. SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS. 1A. VEERABASAVVA D/O. VIRUPAKSHAPPA WALI, W/O. MALLESHAPPA GADAD AGE: 68 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND H.H.WORK, R/O. GADAG, TQ. & DIST: GADAG. 2. SRI CHANDRASHEKARAPPA S/O. VIRUPAKSHAPPA WALI, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. M. ARALIKATTI, HUBLI, TQ: HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD. 3. SRI. VEERAPPA S/O. VIRUPAKSHAPPA WALI, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7034 WP No. 75105 of 2013 R/O. M. ARALIKATTI, HUBLI, TQ: HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. VEERAVVA P1 – ABSENT; SHRI CHANDRASHEKARAPPA P2 – ABSENT; SHRI VEERAPPA – P3 – ABSENT. PETITIOENR NO.1A – DECEASED) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY TO REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BANGALORE – 560001. 2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL HUBLI BY ITS CHAIRMAN THE ASST. COMMISSIONER, HUBLI, TQ: HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD. 3. KARABASAPPA S/O. SIDDAPPA MEESI SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS 3A. SIDDAPPA S/O. KARABASAPPA MEESI AGE: 56 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. TIMMASAGAR ONI, HUBLI, TQ: HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD. 3B. SRI. MURIGEPPA S/O. KARABASAPPA MEESI - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7034 WP No. 75105 of 2013 AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. TIMMASAGAR ONI, TQ: HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD. 3C. GOURAVVA D/O. KARABASAPPA MEESI, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. TIMMASAGAR ONI, HUBLI TQ:HUBLI, DIST: DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI P.S. NAREGAL, ADV. FOR C/R3(A) TO R3(C); SHRI S.Y. SHIVALLI MAHANTAGOUDA, ADV. FOR RESPONDENT NO.3 (A) TO 3(C); SHRI T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SHRI K. K. TERAGUND & SHRI RAKESH S. HATTIKATAGI, ADV.S FOR R3 (A) TO (C) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO: A. CALL FOR RECORDS IN RESPECT OF THE ORDER DATED 26/09/2012 BEARING NO.KLR/SR/MA/40+42 PASSED BY THE LAND TRIBUNAL PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-G. B. QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 26/09/2012 BEARING NO.KLR/SR/MA/40+42 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-G BY ISSUE OF WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER SUITABLE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTIONS. C. ISSUE SUCH OTHER WIT OR ORDER DIRECTIONS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE PRESENT CASE INCLUDING AN ORDER FOR COSTS MAY KINDLY BE PASSED IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:7034 WP No. 75105 of 2013 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA ORAL ORDER The petitioners are called out. Absent. There is no representation on their behalf. 2. The order sheet dated 15.04.2025 reads as under: “Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo seeking permission to retire from the case. It is stated in the memo that learned counsel for the petitioners has no instructions from the petitioners since 2014. The petitioner No.1(A) has not responded to the notice issued to her and the same is returned with postal shara ‘party deceased, returned to sender’. Hence, the memo is accepted. Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to retire. Office to show the names of petitioner Nos.2 and 3 in the cause list. To afford final opportunity to petitioner Nos.2 and 3, list this matter finally as a last chance on 29.04.2025.” 3. In spite of that there is no representation. It is clear that, the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE EM CT:ANB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1