APHC010378752025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 19149/2025 Between: M.RAMESH BABU, S/O. M.JAYACHANDRA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D.NO 24-695, NALLAPPANAIDU KANDIGA, CHANNAMA GUDI PALLI, GANDLAPALLI REVENUE, CHITTOOR URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522237. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI,GUNTURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522503. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -517001. 4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHITTOR URBAN, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -517001. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHITTOR URBAN, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH -517001. 6. M AMRUTHA VALLI, W/O B. KRISHNA, CHANNAMAGUDI PALLI, NALLAPANAIDU KANDRIGA, CHITTOOR URBAN, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 517001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: 2 “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 4 and 5 in involving in the Civil dispute pending the writ petition filed in this Hon’ble Court W.P. 7752 Of 2025 for adjudication with respect to my land in Survey Nos 130/B2 to an extent of Ac.0.50 Cents, Survey No 130/B7 to an extent of Ac. 1.60 Cents, Survey No 192/3 to an extent of Ac. 1.50 Cents, Survey No 233/2B to an extent of Ac. 1.13 Cents, Survey No 232/4C to an extent of Ac.0.18 Cents and Survey No 234/1D to an extent of Ac.0.60 Cents, situated at Gandlapalli Revenue Village, Chittoor Mandal, Chittoor District is as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Violation of Natural Justice consequently direct the 4th respondent to not to summon the petitioner unnecessarily and not to take any coercive steps on the petitioner and follow due process of law in the interest of equity, justice.” 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that, in view of the crime registered against the Petitioner the present writ petition is filed with false allegations against Respondent No.4. Hence, the petition may be disposed of. 3. Sri Dhodla Kishore Kumar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:24.07.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.19149 of 2025 Dt.24.07.2025 Dinesh