Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26778 (AP)

M.NARAYANASWAMY NAIDU v. SMT.A.BARATHAMMA

CRP/2100/2023 · 2025-07-01

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010379572023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2100/2023 Between: 1. M.NARAYANASWAMY NAIDU, S/O M.MUNASWAMY NAIDU, AGE ABOUT YEARS, OCC. HOTEL BUSINESS, R/O MAIN BAZAR STREET, V.KOTA VILLAGE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SMT A BARATHAMMA, D/O A.R.LAKSHMAIAH NAIDU, AGE ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O MAIN BAZAR ROAD, V.KOTA VILLAGE POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. A REDDAPPA NAIDU, S/O A.R.LAKSHMAIAH NAIDU, AGE ABOUT 59 YEARS, OCC. PETTY MERCHANT, R/O V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 3. SUSEELAMMA, W/O MUNASWAMY, AGE ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1-6-748/B, INDIRA NAGAR, OPPOSITE TO BALAJI TALKIES, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. K V SREENIVASAIAH, S/O VENKATAGIREPPA, AGE ABOUT 73 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O KANDIRIGANIKUPPAM, KYASAMBALLA HOBLI, YENNA SANDRA POST, BANGARUPET TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA STATE. 5. DARSI SUBRAMANYAM CHETTY, S/O DARSI GOVINDARAJULU CHETTY, AGE ABOUT 63 YEARS, OCC. MERCHANT, R/O V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 6. DARSI DEVARAJULU, S/O DARSI GOVINDARAJULY CHETTY, AGE ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC.MERCHANT, R/O V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2 7. JAMUNA, W/O LATE A.R.SREERAMULU NAIDU, AGE ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 8. A NAGENDRA BABU, S/O LATE A.R.SREERAMULU NAIDU, AGE ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 9. A JAYENDRA, S/O LATE A.R.SREERAMULU NAIDU, AGE ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 10. A BHAVANI PRASAD, S/O LATE A.R.SREERAMULU NAIDU, AGE ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 11. A REDDI LAKSHMI, W/O ASHOK KUMAR, AGE ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 12. REDDY MANI, W/O SUMAN BABU, AGE ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 13. SMT A SANTHAMMA, W/O LATE A.REDDAPPA NAIDU, AGE ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.2-701, V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 14. A DHANANJAYA, S/O LATE A.REDDAPPA NAIDU, AGE ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO.2-701, V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 15. A BHAVANI SAI PRASAD, S/O LATE A.REDDAPPA NAIDU, AGE ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO.2-701, V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 16. SMT MOHANA KUMARI, W/O RAMESH BABU, AGE ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.2-701, V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 17. SMT PAVANI, W/O VASUDEVA, AGE ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.2-701, V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 18. SMT BHAGYALAKSHMI, W/O MOGILEESWARAIAH, AGE ABOUT 32 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.2 701, V.KOTA VILLAGE, POST AND MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 3 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased allow the appeal by setting aside the order dated 10-04- 2023 passed in IA.No.63 of 2020 in AS.No.58 of 2017, on the file of Principal District Judge, Chittoor and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings including passing of final decree pursuant to the judgment and decree dated 11-09-2013 passed in O.S.No.37 of 2001, on the file of Principal District Judge, Chittoor, pending disposal of Second Appeal and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 4 ORDER:- The present revision petition is filed questioning the order dated 10.04.2023 in I.A.No.63 of 2020 in A.S.No.58 of 2017, on the file of Principal District Judge, Chittoor. 2) When the matter is taken up for hearing, as can be seen from the report received from the District Judiciary that, the Appeal in A.S.No.58 of 2017, on the file of on the file of Principal District Judge, Chittoor was dismissed on 10.04.2023. 3) In view of the same, nothing survives to be adjudicated in the instant revision and accordingly the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR Dated: 02.07.2025 SCS 5 130 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CRP No.2100 of 2023 Dated: 02.07.2025 SCS