2025:HHC:5514 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 16679 of 2024 Decided on: 10.03.2025 Vedvanti … Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Ms. Madhurika Sekhon, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. AG. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has primarily prayed for the following reliefs:- “i) That the respondents may kindly be directed to compensate the petitioner for the handloom small scale business which was closed on the account of acquisition proceedings so that petitioner can re-establish her lost business. ii) That the respondent No. 2 may kindly be directed to decided the representations pending before the respondents.” 2. After making her submissions for some time and when confronted with the factum of the maintainability of the present writ petition, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner be allowed to withdraw the this writ petition, but with liberty to 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:5514 approach the Civil Court. The petition is accordingly permitted to be withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 10, 2025 (narender)