APHC010006572002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17778/2002 Between: 1. T.SIVAIAH, GUNTUR, S/O.VEERAIAH, NMR DRIVER THE EXECUTIVE, A.P.SCHEDULED CASTE SERVICES CO-OP.SOCIETY, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. MD APSC COOP FIN CORP LTD HYD 2 ORS, A.P. SCHEDULED CASTE CO-OP.FINANCE CORP. LTD., HYDERABAD. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHAIRMAN, A.P. SCHEDULED CASTE CO-OP.FINANCE CORP. LTD., GUNTUR. 3. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, A.P. SCHEDULED CASTE CO- OP.FINANCE CORP. LTD., GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of Certiorari calling for all the connected records including the impugned proceedings No.LC2/954/APPS/2000 DATED 21.9.2001/ OF THE 1ST Respondent and quash the same as illegal, improper, unjust arbitrary and contrary to law an further direct the first respondent to absorb the petitioner as driver with all consequential benefits from the date on which he completed five years of service including monetary, seniority etc., 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 21986 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the impugned order of the first respondent in LC 2/954/APSC/2000 dated 21.9.2001 and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2002(WPMP 22329 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of the impugned order of the first respondent in LC 2/954/APSC/2000 dated 21.9.2001 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K G KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. CH C SATYANARAYANA 2. GANDRALA RATHNA KUMAR SC For APSCCFC LTD 3. B PRAKASAM ( SC FOR AP APSCCFC) The Court made the following: ORDER: On 07.07.2025 and 24.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 3 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 21st August, 2025 RKS