Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26769 (AP)

B V SESHA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/19302/2024 · 2025-07-07

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010380012024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 19302/2024 Between: 1. B V SESHA REDDY, S/O B. SUNDARARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, R/O D.NO.304, BTM LAYOUT, TSTSTAGE, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPADI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI DISTRICT, TIRUPATI, A.P. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI DIVISION,TIRUPATI, A.P. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, TIRUPATI TIRUPATI, DISTRICT A.P 5. THE SUB REGISTRAR, RENIGUNTA, TIRUPATI DISTRICT A.P. 6. V SUDHAKAR BABU, S/O V LAKSHMI NARAYANA AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN YEARS, R/O D.NO.535 REDDY AND REDDY COLONY, TIRUPATI DISTRICT A.P. 7. P SRIHARI RAO, S/O P NARAYANASWAMI AGED ABOUT NOT KNOWN YEARS, R/O D.NO.734, MALAPETA, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT A.P. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 2,to 4 in not taking any action with regard to the land measuring to Ac.1.00 cts Sy.No.211/1 of Chennaiahgunta Village, Tirupati Urban Mandal and in issuing impugned proceedings in D.Dis (A) /119/2017 dated 19.07.2017 issued by the 4th respondent and consequential proceedings of the 3rd respondent in D Dis No.C/412/2022 dt.06-04-2022also in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 6.01.2024 made before the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary, and also oppose to Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India and also oppose to all cannons of Justice consequentially suspend the operation of the proceedings D.Dis(A) /119/2017 dated 19.07.2017 issued by the 4th respondent as well as the consequential proceedings of the 3rd respondent in D Dis No.C/412/2022 dt.06-04-2022by directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 16.01.2024 and to pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents suspend the operation of the proceedings D.Dis (A) /119/2017 dated 19.07.2017 issued by the 4th respondent as well as the consequential proceedings of the 3rd respondent in D Dis No.C/412/2022 dt.06-04-2022 by directing the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated: 16.01.2024 pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MUNI REDDY PERURU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 19302 OF 2024 ORDER: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner circulated letter dated 27.06.2025 to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded, as sought for. 3. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 4. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand dismissed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA Date:08.07.2025 SP 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 19302/2024 Date:08.07.2025 W SP