Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26767 (BOM)

AMHI SEVAK SANSTHA LATUR THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS

WP/10239/2025 · 2025-10-13

Shri Arun R Pedneker

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 wp10239.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 361 WRIT PETITION NO. 10239 OF 2025 AMHI SEVAK SANSTHA LATUR THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Salunke Mayur Vasant AGP for Respondents/State: Mr. A. R. Kale ... CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 13.10.2025 PER COURT: 1. Heard. 2. The learned AGP points out the letter dated 06.10.2025, whereby the State has taken decision not to further extent the registration / licence of the petitioner to run the institute beyond 30.09.2025. 3. The learned AGP submits that in view of this communication no further adjudication to any quasi judicial order would survive in this court as the registration itself has come to an end. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would challenge the communication dated 06.10.2025 before the Division Bench of this court on appropriate grounds. 2025:BHC-AUG:28754 2 wp10239.2025 5. Considering the same, liberty is granted to the petitioner to challenge the communication dated 06.10.2025 and, also, the impugned order in this matter. 6. There was interim order operating in force during the pendency of the proceeding, the same is continued till 15.10.2025, so as to enable the petitioner to approach the Division Bench and seek appropriate orders. 7. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. [ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.] marathe