Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26761 (AP)

B.Ganga Bhavani, v. The Tahsildar,

WP/25222/2020 · 2025-09-23

B Krishna Mohan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010378682020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 25222/2020 Between: 1. B.GANGA BHAVANI,, W/O. NAGESWARARAO, AGE 70 YEARS, D. NO. 2-81, THOLERU, VEERAVASARAM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE TAHSILDAR, MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, VEERAVASARAM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU 3. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of 1st Respondent in assigning the land for house sites under NAVARATNALU program dated 25-12-2020 by issuing endorsement dated 09-09-2020 in Roc. No. 218/2020(B), admeasuring Ac. 1-74 cents which is classified as cart track/bandi dhari in survey No. 188 of Tholeru Village, Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District, as illegal, 2 arbitrary, contrary to law and the same is prohibited under Andhra Pradesh Revenue Board Standing Orders (for short B.S.O) and pas IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to assign for house sites in Survey No. 188 admeasuring 1-74 cents classified as cart track/Bandi Dhari covered in Survey No. 188 of Tholeru Village, Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following Order: No representation for the petitioner. Heard the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the 1st respondent in assigning the land for house sites under Navaratnalu programme dated 25.12.2020 by issuing endorsement dated 09.09.2020 in Roc.No.218/2020(B), admeasuring Ac.1-74 cents which is classified as cart track/ bandi dhari in Sy.No.188 of Tholeru village, Veeravasaram Mandal, West Godavari District. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the respondent authorities will follow the due process with respect to the subject land. 4. On perusal of the impugned endorsement of the 1st respondent dated 09.09.2020, it is clear that, the subject land in an extent of Ac.1.74 cents in R.S.No.188 of Tholeru Village, after facilitating Ac.1.15 cents as bandi dari for ingress and egress and for doing their agricultural operations of the villagers, the remaining extent of 59 cents was proposed for house sites to the houseless eligible beneficiaries. The petitioner is not in possession of the subject land and it is an open land. Either canal or canal bund is not involved in the said survey number. There is no obstruction for ingress and egress and to attend their agricultural operations. 4 5. In view of the clear observations of the 1st respondent by way of the impugned endorsement dated 09.09.2020, this court finds no reason to interfere with the same. However, it is made clear that the respondent Nos.1 & 2 shall deal with the subject land covered under the impugned endorsement of the 1st respondent dated 09.09.2020 strictly in accordance with law if so warranted for any public purpose. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Interim order if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 24.09.2025 NNN