Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2676 (RAJ)

RAMNARAYAN @ MONU SON OF DHARASINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/332/2025 · 2025-01-09

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:1424] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 332/2025 Ramnarayan @ Monu Son Of Dharasingh, Aged About 20 Years, Resident Of Kiratpura, Police Station Bandikui, District Dausa. (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal Mr. Bharat Lal Mali For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 09/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.418/2024 registered at Police Station Bandikui, District Dausa (Raj.) for the offences punishable under Section 140(3), 308(2) & 127(7) of BNS. Later on, police filed charge-sheet in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 140(3), 308(2), 309(4) & 127(7) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. Counsel submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 05.11.2024. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:1424] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-332/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; alleged offence is triable by Magistrate; absence of criminal antecedents of the petitioner; looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Ramnarayan @ Monu Son Of Dharasingh shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J Sunita Kanwar /170