Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26759 (AP)

KALYANAM SUNIL v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/1192/2020 · 2025-08-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010378852019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION No.1192 / 2020 Between: 1. KALYANAM SUNIL, S/O.NARAYANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, HINDU, 8TH LANE, RAMALINGESWARA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLICPROCECUTOR AMARAVATHI. 2. KALYANAM VENKATANAGAMANI ANUSHA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, HINDU, CHAKRAYAPALEM VILLAGE, TENALI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court please to call for the entire lower court records in C.R.P. On 09-08-2019 against the M.C.No.14 of 2014 on the file of Court of the II Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate at Tenali and passed the Orders in the M.C. 30-10-2017 and set-aside the lower court orders quash the same pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. NARASIMHA RAO M R L Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed, by the Petitioner/Accused seeking for the following relief : 2 “ ... please to call for the entire lower court records in C.R.P. On 09- 08-2019 against the M.C.No.14 of 2014 on the file of Court of the II Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate at Tenali and passed the Orders in the M.C. 30.10.2017 and set-aside the lower court orders quash the same pass ... “ 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today. 3. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner. 4. Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State is in attendance. 5. In that view, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No. 1192 of 2020 06.08. 2025 Mjl /*