IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1046 of 2025 Date of decision: 01.03.2025 Amit Bhalla. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Meera Devi, Advocate, vice Ms. Jyoti Dogra, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petition lacks material particulars and pleadings. Even the grounds on which relief has been prayed for have not been elaborated. Furthermore, the relief clause is not properly worded. 2. Confronted with the above, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh with proper pleadings. The prayer is accepted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1st March, 2025 Judge (Pardeep) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes