Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26748 (AP)

Smt.D.Suvedamma, v. State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/18166/2019 · 2025-08-21

Ninala Jayasurya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010379112019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 18166/2019 Between: 1. SMT.D.SUVEDAMMA,, W/O GOKARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS. 2. MALLEPOGU ANANEEYA,, S/O PEDDI RAJU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS. 3. MALLEPOGU RAJANNA @ RAJULU,, S/O CHINNA YELLAIAH, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF THANGEDANCHA VILLAGE, JUPADU BANGALOW MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHASILDAR, JUPADU BUNGALOW MANDAL, JUPADU BUNGALOW, KURNOOL DIST. 6. SMT MADIGA SHANTHA KUMARI, W/O NAGABHUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O THANGEDANCHA VILLAGE, JUPADU NJS,J W.P No.18166 of 2019 2 BANGALOW MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or any other order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in not disposing the stay application filed in CCLA Appeal No.182/2019 preferred against the order of the 3rd respondent in Rc.E2/2011/2018, dated 13.6.2019 as illegal and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to dispose the stay application forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to take any coercive steps pursuant to the order of the 3rd respondent in Rc.E2/2011/2018, dated 13.6.2019, including dispossession of the petitioners from their respective extents of lands Ac.1.00, Ac.3.00 and Ac.1.00 situated in Sy.No.27B/C of Thangedancha Village, Jupadu Bangalow Mandal, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) NJS,J W.P No.18166 of 2019 3 The Court made the following: Mr. V Jagadeesh, learned counsel, representing the learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. This Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:22.08.2025 Ksj