Pilla Bhaskara Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/18175/2019 · 2025-08-31
B V L N Chakravarthi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26745 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26745 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010379482019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 18175/2019
Between:
1. PILLA BHASKARA RAO,, S/O PARADESI NAIDU. HINDU, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. PIHAL VARI STREET, GAVARAPALEM. ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. REP.BY HIS GPA HOLDER DADI SANYASI RAO. S/O VENKATA RAMANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO. 39-22-10/1, KALINGA NAGAR, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT. VELAGAPUDI, AINARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL DISTRICT, CHINA WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PARAVADA POLICE STATION. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. PILLA JANARDHAN, , S/O PARADESI NAIDU. HINDU. AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS. 5. PILLA KISHORE, S/O JANARDHAN, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS. 2
6. PILLA RAMANA BABU, S/O JANARDHAN, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. (PETITIONERS 4 TO 6 ARE RIO. DOOR NO. 159, GYRAMMA STREET, GAVARAPALEM, ANAKAPALLI. VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT). ...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not registering a crime against the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 on the complaint dt. 10.10.2019 lodged by the petitioner for the illegal acts of the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 and not investigating into the matter inspite of several requests made by the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unfair and contrary to the Fundamental Principles enshrined in the Constitution and consequently direct the respondent 3 to register the crime against the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 on the complaint dt. 10.10.2019 lodged by the petitioner and investigate into the matter
IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to forthwith register a crime against the unofficial respondents 4 to 6 on the complaint dt. 10.10.2019 lodged by the petitioner and take appropriate action on the same, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.
RAJESH MATCHA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO:18175 of 2019 The Court made the following Order: Sri Rajesh Matcha, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI Dated: 01.09.2025 PSA
4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 18175 of 2019
Date: 01.09.2025 PSA