IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 25227 OF 2020 Between: Porumamilla Prameela, W/o. Prasad, Occ: Agriculture, Aged about 48 years R/o. Gurappagari Palle Village, Poramamilla Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. The District Collector, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. The Tahsildar, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. P. Susheela Sangitha, W/o Prasanna Kumar Age 25 years, R/o Gurrappagari Palle Village, Porumamilla Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. 2. 3. 4. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or orders more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land of the petitioner to an extent of Ac. 1.94 cents in Sy.No. 792-6 situated at Ranga Samudram Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District without issuing any notice to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violation of principles of natural justice and also in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land of the p petitioner to an extent of Ac. 1.94 cents in Sy.No. 792-6 situated at Ranga Samudram Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may possession and enjoyment of the land of the petitioner to an extent of Ac. 1.94 cents in Sy.No. 792-6 situated at Ranga Samudram Village, Porumamilla Mandal Mandal, YSR Kadapa District pending disposal of the above writ petition. be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful lA NO: 1 OF 2021 Between; P. Susheela Sangitha, W/o Prasanna Kumar Age 25 years, R/o Gurrappagari Palle Village, Porumamilla Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. ...VACATE PETITIONER AND 1. Porumamilla Prameela, W/o. Prasad, Occ; Agriculture, Aged about 48 years, R/o. Gurappagari Palle Village, Poramamilla Mandal, Y.S.R. Kadapa District. ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 4. The Tahsildar, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 to 3 in WP No.25227 of 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 24-12-2020 passed in I.A.No. 1 of 2020 in W.P.No. 25227 of 2020 and to dismiss the main writ petition with costs. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI DODDAKA HARSHA VARDHAN Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI P.L. NARASIMHA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER c< APHC010378752020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 25227/2020 Between: ...PETITIONER Porumamilla Prameela AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DODDAKA HARSHA VARDHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE 2.P LNARASIMHA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER;- Heard Sri Doddaka Harsha Vardhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri P.L.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for the 4**^ respondent. Challenging the action of the respondents in interfering with the 2. peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property in an extent of Ac. 1.94 cents in Sy.No.792-6 situated at Rangasamudram Village, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District, the present writ petition is filed. 2 When the matter is coming up for hearing, the learned Assistant 3. Government Pleader for Revenue placed before the Court, a copy of instructions received by him, in the case. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the revenue 4. authorities have not interfered with the petitioner’s alleged land. He further argues that there are civil disputes between the petitioner and the unofficial respondents, the same were decreed on 21.10.2020. The Learned counsel for the unofficial respondent argued that the suit filed by the unofficial respondent No. 4 was decreed on 21.10.2020; thereafter, the writ petition was filed on 23.12.2020 alleging the interference by the unofficial respondent. He contends that after the suit was decreed, the petitioner filed the writ petition with unfounded allegations, to dilute the decree. He thus prays for the dismissal of the writ petition. Having regard to the fact that the parties have already invoked the jurisdiction of the Civil Court for the redressal of their grievance, the present writ petition with a very similar relief under Article 226 of the 5. Constitution of India, as sought by the unofficial respondent in the suit, is not maintainable without any specific averment or any evidence in support of the averment that the official respondents have interfered with the possession of the petitioner. However, the petitioner is at liberty to seek appropriate remedy before the appropriate authority. m 3 In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner and unofficial respondents to avail appropriate remedies for redressal of their grievance, in respect of subject lis. With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. 7. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SDl- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY .REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// I SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Andhra Pradesh, Principal Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District. 2. The District Collector, Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District. 3. The Tahsildar, Porumamilla Mandal, YSR Kadapa District. 4. One CC to Sri Doddaka Harsha Vardhan, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 6. One CC to Sri P.L. Narasimha Rao, Advocate (OPUC) 7. Three C.D. Copies. Cnr ✓ N high court DATED:07/01/2025 ORDER WP.No.25227 of 2020 5 OF 0 7 FES 2025 ' X o Currant Section . ^ .^SPaTCVA^^^^ DISPOSING THE W P WITHOUT COSTS