[2025:RJ-JP:31806] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9934/2025 1. Roshan S/o Pappulal, R/o Budhpura Police Station Dabi District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi). 2. Sumit @ Anta S/o Charan, R/o Budhpura Police Station Dabi District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9935/2025 1. Mohit S/o Jagdish, R/o Budhpura Police Station Dabi District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi). 2. Abhishek S/o Raju, R/o Budhpura Police Station Dabi District Bundi Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10300/2025 Shairu @ Deepak S/o Raju, R/o Village Budhpura, Police Station Dabi, District Bundi (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined In District Jail Bundi, District Bundi) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Liyakat Ali Ms. Rekha Arora For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP with Mr. Shubham Kumar Sain, AAG [2025:RJ-JP:31806] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9934/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/08/2025 1. These applications for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicants-accused Roshan S/o Pappulal, Sumit @ Anta S/o Charan, Mohit S/o Jagdish, Abhishek S/o Raju and Shairu @ Deepak S/o Raju in FIR No. 98/2025 dated 07.06.2025 registered at P.S. Dabi District -Bundi, whereby the applicant-accused were charged under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 109(1), 61(2) of BNS. 2. During course of argument, learned counsel for petitioner offers to withdraw bail application of petitioner Mohit S/o Jagdish, therefore we are not considering bail application of Mohit S/o Jagdish. 3. The applicants were arrested and are in judicial custody since their arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicants are innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further, he submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and are no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused are required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submits that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicants-accused in custody. [2025:RJ-JP:31806] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9934/2025] 5. Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that during investigation, police has recorded statement of complainant injured Kalawati Bai and injured Jitendra and both of them have attributed injury to Ganesh S/o Jagdish. They further submitted that no specific attribution of injury is made upon any of the petitioners and they are no more required sin the instant case. They further submitted that after investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. 6. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 7. Heard learned counsel for the applicants-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. 8. On the basis of report lodged by complainant Kalawati Bai against Mohit and others, matter is investigated and during investigation injury reports of Kalawati and Jitendra were procured. During investigation, it was found that attribution of injury caused to injured Jitendra is upon Ganesh and a knife has been recovered by police from Ganesh during investigation. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet has been filed. 9. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the [2025:RJ-JP:31806] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9934/2025] case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused. 10. Thus, the bail applications filed on behalf of applicants- accused Roshan S/o Pappulal, Sumit @ Anta S/o Charan, Abhishek S/o Raju, Shairu @ Deepak S/o Raju, is hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be released on condition that each of them would furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 11. The bail application preferred by petitioner Mohit S/o Jagdish is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. 12. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /359-360&42