1 2025:CGHC:32894-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 910 of 2021 Mohd. Arif Rokadia S/o Mohd. Daud Rokadia Aged About 46 Years Occupation Partner (M/s Ayasha Cold Storage) Village Chitod , Tahsil Gurur, District Balod Chattisgarh, R/o Salewar Para Near Old Haddi Godam , Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh , At Present House No. 48 Aakash Ganga Colony , Rudri Road, District Dhamtari Pin 493 773 ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director General Of Police Chhattisgarh , Head Quarter , Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Superintendent Of Police District Balod Chhatitsgarh. 4 - Station House Officer Gurur District Balod Chhattisgarh. 5 - Mohd. Salim Rokadia S/o Mohd. Daud Rokadia Aged About 49 Years R/o Salewar Para, Near Old Haddi Godown Dhamtari , Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Shahnaz Bano W/o Mohd. Salim Rokadia Aged About 45 Years R/o Salewar Para , Near Old Haddi Godown , Dhamtari, Tahsil And District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : None present For Respondents : Mr.Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.07.15 18:29:04 +0530 2 No.1 to 4/State For Respondents No.5 and 6 : Ms.K.Tripti Rao, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 15.07.2025 1. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition when the case is called out. However, Mr.Sakib Ahmed, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondents No.1 to 4/State and Ms.K.Tripti Rao, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.5 and 6, are present. 2. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner with following prayer: “It is therefore prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be quashed the FIR no.0216/2021, dated 13.07.2021, and give direction to concern police station to take complaint of the petitioner and proceed the matter accordingly, in the interest of justice.” 3. None appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition when the case is called out. 4. It transpires that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter. 5. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondents No.1 to 4/State submits that in the present case, the charge-sheet has been 3 submitted. 6. In view of above, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Bablu