A APHC010379002010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 684 OF 2010 Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated: 05.07.2010 passed in O.S No.22/2006 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge (FTC), at Gudivada. Between: Yenugukoti Naga Puma Mangeswara Rao, S/o Ranga Rao, Hindu Aged about 57 years. Agriculture, R/o Door No. 12/241, Pedana Village, Pedana Mandal, Krishna District. ...Appellant (Defendant) AND Angadala Nagamalli Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Srinivasa Rao, Hindu Aged about 50 years. Properties, R/o Door No. 2/185, Gurunadham Hotel Road, Gudivada, Krishna District. ...Respondent (Plaintiff) Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. P Madhavi representing Sri CH Markondaiah Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Jogeswara Rao Kanchibhotia The Court made the following order: A i APHC010379002010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE [3368] PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 684 OF 2010 Between: 1.YENUGUKOTI NAGA PURNA MANGESWARA RAO, S/0 RANGA RAO, HINDU AGRICULTURE R/0 DOOR NO. 12/241, PEDANA VILLAGE, PEDANA MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1.ANGADALA NAGAMALLI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/o. Srinivasa Rao, Hindu Properties R/o Door No. 2/185, Gurunadham Hotel Road, Gudivada, Krishna District. ...RESPONDENT lA NO: 1 OF 2010fASMP 1875 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in Execution of the Decree in OS No. 22 of 2006 dt. 5-7-2010 on the file The Addl. Senior Civil Judge, (FTC) at Gudivada pending disposal of the main appeal and pass lA NO: 1 OF 201irASMP 1000 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dt. 30/12/2010 and made in ASMP.No. 1875 of 2010 and dismiss the stay petition \ 2 Counsel for the Appellant: 1.CH MARKONDAIAH Counsel for the Respondent: 1.R PRASAD 2.JOGESWARA RAO KANCHIBHOTIA The Court made the following Judgment: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. P.Madhavi learned counsel representing Ch.Markondaiah, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that during the pendency of the Appeal, the cause in the present Appeal has become infructuous and hence, the Appeal may be disposed of, accordingly. Leafned counsel for the respondent is in attendance. 2. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the appellant, this Appeal Suit is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER The Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) (FTC), at Gudivada, Krishna District, (with records) One CC to Sri Ch Markondaiah, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to Sri Jogeswara Rao Kanchibhotia, Advocate [OPUC] The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati. Two CD Copies To, 1. 2. 3. 4. at 5. SAM sree \ ■ ■ HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025 JUDGMEMNT A.S No. 684 of 2010 I f I JUL 2825 ^ Current Secnon . ^ OY DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS