[2025:RJ-JP:34428] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9916/2025 Ajay Raj Rav S/o Shri Dhanraj Rav, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ramleela Chowk, Near Tejaji Mandir, Sanwatsar, Kishangarh, At Present R/o Ward No. 10, Maliyo Ki Dhani, R.D.K.L. School Wali Gali, Ramnagar, Kishangarh, P.S. Gandhinagar District Ajmer (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.204/2025 registered at Police Station Madanganj, District Ajmer for the offences punishable under Section 109(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023 and Section 5/25 of Arms Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that it is a case of no injury. He further submits that petitioner is not named in the FIR. He contends that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues [2025:RJ-JP:34428] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9916/2025] that the petitioner is in custody since 09.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that it is a case of no injury; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner - Ajay Raj Rav S/o Shri Dhanraj Rav shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/168