354-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14011-2018 Date of decision: 06.05.2025 SHARAT AGGARWAL ….PETITIONER(S) Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. Hemant Saini, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Praveen Bhadu, AAG, Haryana. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J.(ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous since the FIR already stood quashed vide CRM-M-3555-2025. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 06.05.2025 kanika i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No KANIKA 2025.05.07 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment