Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 16381 of 2024 Decided on : 10.01.2025 Nitin Soni. …Petitioner Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh. …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Sunil Dutt Gautam, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner has directly approached this Court without firstly making a representation to the employer vis-à-vis the reliefs being claimed in the petition, as prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate representation to the respondent-Department vis-à- vis the issues raised in the present petition.
2. In the event of any such representation being filed 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 within 2 weeks’, let appropriate decision thereupon be taken by the competent Authority, within 8 weeks’ as from the date of the receipt thereof. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
January 10, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)