[2025:RJ-JP:7420] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 324/2025 Raju Meena @ Raju Langda S/o Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Kherli, Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In Dist. Jail Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 19/02/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.447/2024 registered at Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS (Corresponding to Section 379 of IPC). During investigation, offences punishable under Sections 303(2) & 313 of BNS (corresponding to Section 379 & 401 of IPC) have been found proved against the petitioner. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. Counsel submits that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. Petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:7420] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-324/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is habitual offender and 14 other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Raju Meena @ Raju Langda S/o Kanhaiyalal shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. [2025:RJ-JP:7420] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-324/2025] 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN), J LALIT MOHAN /115