APHC010379082025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19445/2025 Between: 1. KOYYA NARASINAGA RAO, S/O. LATE APPALANARASAYYA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC LABOUR, R/O. CHILLA STREET, GUDIVADA VILLAGE, GUDIVADA POST, BHOGAPURAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P, PIN CODE 531162 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P, PIN- 535003 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P. PIN-535003. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BHOGAPURAM POLICE STATION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P. PIN-531216. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHOGAPURAM P.S., VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, A.P, PIN-531216 6. DWARAMPUDI SUBBAREDDY, S/O, LATE VENKATAREDDY, D.NO.49-17-14, NEAR THONDAM VINAYAKA TEMPLE, LALITHA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM BASTHI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P, PIN-530016. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 5 in not registering the case against the respondent no.6 and Henchmen's even though the petitioner had lodged a complaint before the 5th respondent on 14.04.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to register the case and arrest the respondent no. 6 and Henchmen's to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to register the case and arrest the Respondent no. 6 and henchmen's in the interest of justice and in the interest of the petitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K GANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 5 in not registering the case against the respondent no.6 and Henchmen's even though the petitioner had lodged a complaint before the 5th respondent on 14.04.2025, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to register the case and arrest the respondent no. 6 and Henchmen's to pass.…” 2. Sri V. Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the police have conducted an enquiry, where it came to be known that the dispute is purely civil in nature and the police are not interfering in the civil dispute. 3. Sri K. Gani Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that, recording the same, the writ petition may be disposed of. 4. Recording the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 31.07.2025 MH THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 31 WRIT PETITION NO: 19445/2025 Dt.31.07.2025 MH