Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:15815
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 33 of 2021 1 - Fabianus Minj S/o Late S. Minj, Aged About 62 Years R/o Loyola Niketan, Rajeev Vihar, Lingiyadih, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, 2 - Theodore Toppo, S/o Julius Toppo (As Per Adhar Card) Aged About 65 Years R/o Loyola Niketan, Rajeev Vihar, Lingiyadih, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Appellants versus 1 - Shrawan Kumar Singh S/o Shri Raj Bahadur Singh, Aged About 41 Years R/o House No. 80, Patliputra Nagar, Loyola Road, Lingiyadih, Police Station Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
... Respondents For Appellants : Mr. Shyam Kumar, Adv. on behalf of Mr. Achyut Tiwari, Adv. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Saurabh Agrawal, Adv. For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Ritesh Giri, Adv. Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2025.04.07 10:54:46 +0530
2 (Hon’ble Mr. Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi)
Order on Board 03/04/2025
1 At the outset, learned counsel for the appellants would submit that, the Civil Suit No. 102-A/2021 pending before the 4th Upper District Judge, Bilaspur, has been disposed of, as settlement has been arrived at between the parties out of the Court in National Lok Adalat held on 8-3-2025, therefore, he submits that, this misc. appeal, which has been preferred against rejection of application filed by the plaintiff under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of the CPC, has become infructuous.
2.
Learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 1 also conceded aforesaid fact.
3. Having considered aforesaid fact, this appeal is dismissed as rendered infructuous.
4. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Pathak