CHANDRA SHEKHAR TRIPATHI SON OF LATE DR. RAMNAKSHTRA TRIPATHI v. SMT. PUNAM, SECRETARY
CCP/746/2024 · 2025-02-05
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Uma Shanker Vyas
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26716 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26716 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:5158-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 746/2024
1. Chandra Shekhar Tripathi Son Of Late Dr. Ramnakshtra Tripathi, Aged About 27 Years, Residing At Village Tileuli, Post Baghuri, District Ballia, U.p.
2. Vijay Laxmi Tripathi Daughter Of Late Dr. Ramnakshtra Tripathi, Residing At Village Tileuli, Post Baghuri, District Ballia, U.p. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Smt. Punam, Secretary, Sanskrit Education, Department Of Sanskrit Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Shri Vijaypal Singh, Director Sanskrit Education, Department Of Sanskrit Education Shiksha Shankul, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretariat, Department Of Sanskrit Education, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. DP Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shikha Sharma on behalf of Mr. GS Gill, AAG HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Order 05/02/2025
1. Heard.
2. This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of order dated 06.11.2015 passed in the case of State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. The Managing Committee
[2025:RJ-JP:5158-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-746/2024] Sh. Bhagwan Das Todi College-D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No.663/2015.
3. This Court had issued notices to respondents. In the reply, it has been stated for want of relevant records available with the authorities, it is not possible to decide the claim of the deceased employee.
4. Otherwise also, we find that the order was passed in the year 2015 and the deceased employee did not take any steps.
5. Therefore, this matter cannot be proceeded further in the contempt proceedings. It will be open for the petitioner to file a fresh petition seeking appropriate directions.
6. The contempt petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Rule is discharged.
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ NAVAL GANDHI-RAHUL/45