[2025:RJ-JP:17254] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6388/2021 1. Pooja Kanwar D/o Shanker Singh W/o Jitendra Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Fadanpura, Teh. Ramgarh, Sikar, Rajasthan-333033 2. Jitendra Singh Shekhawat S/o Shri Ramotar Singh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Vill. Chorardi Aguni The. Chidawa Dist. Jhunjhunu. Rajasthan-332301. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Department Of Home Affairs Govt. Secretariat Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 3. Inspector General Of Police Jaipur Range, Jaipur Rajasthan. 4. Superintendent Of Police, Jhunjhunu. 5. Sho, Police Station Chidawa, Dist. Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 6. Superintendent Of Police, Sikar. 7. Sho, Police Station Ramgarh, Dist, Sikar, Rajasthan. 8. Shanker Singh S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Fadanpura, Teh. Ramgarh, Sikar Rajasthan 333033 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Kumar Paliwal for Mr. Rhishiraj Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 23/04/2025 1. Heard and considered. 2. Vide the judgment dated 02.08.2024 in S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 792/2024 titled as Suman Meena & Anr. Vs. [2025:RJ-JP:17254] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6388/2021] State of Rajasthan & Ors., this Court issued directions specifying the mechanisms/remedies which may be invoked by the person(s) who seek the implementation of measures to ensure their safety, on account of extra-legal threats to their lives or liberty from other social actors or groups. Therefore, the matter is no longer res integra, and is squarely covered by the directions of this Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra). 3. This Court observes that in the present case, the petitioner(s) has/have failed to comply with the directions of this Court in the judgment of Suman Meena (supra). Further, the Registry has failed to ensure that the petition includes due pleadings and a footnote disclosing the details which indicate that the alternative efficacious remedies have already been availed of in accordance with the directions of this Court in Suman Meena (supra). 4. Accordingly, in terms of the judgment pronounced in Suman Meena (supra), the instant petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. 5. A copy of this order be sent to the Registrar (Judicial) to ensure compliance with the directions issued by this Court in Suman Meena (supra) regarding the contents of the petitions wherein directions are sought pertaining to protection. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/100