DARASINGH @ DARIYA S/O SHRI BANWARILAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/319/2025 · 2025-01-10
Ganesh Ram Meena
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2671 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2671 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:1575] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 319/2025
1. Darasingh @ Dariya S/o Shri Banwarilal, R/o Village Jainpurbas, Police Station Behror Sadar, District Kotputli Behror, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror)
2. Mohar Singh @ Mohari @ Pahalwan @ Mukhram S/o Shri Ugrasen, R/o Kasu Ki Dhani, Tan Shyampura, Police Station Bansur, District Kotputli Behror, Raj. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Behror) ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 10/01/2025
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 483 B.N.S.S., in connection with F.I.R. No.09/2023 registered at Police Station Behror, District Bhiwadi for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 341, 332, 353, 307 & 120-B of IPC and under Sections 3/25 & 5/27 of the Arms Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioner (Darasingh @ Dariya) is in custody since 07.11.2024 and the accused-petitioner (Mohar Singh @ Mohari) is in custody since 28.10.2024. Counsel further submits that co-accused namely; Sonu @ SP Gurjar, Prakash, Sachin @ Romi, Ramphal @ Rajat Gurjar & Vikarm @ Vika have already been enlarged on bail and the case of the present accused-petitioners is not
[2025:RJ-JP:1575] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-319/2025] distinguishable in any manner to that of co-accused who have been enlarged on bail, therefore, the present accused-petitioners may be released on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State opposed the bail application but could not distinguish the case of the present accused-petitioners from the case of other co-accused who have been enlarged on bail.
4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Taking into consideration the allegations levelled against the petitioners and so also the law of parity but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems just and proper to enlarged the accused-petitioners on bail.
6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /48