2025:JHHC:23431-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.1107 of 2024 ----- Nand Ram, son of Late Dil Bahadur Chhetri, resident of Chutia, P.O. & P.S. Chutia, Ranchi. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra, the General Manager, S.E. Railway, Garden Reach, P.O. & P.S. Garden Reach, Kolkata. 3. Mr. Manish Kaushal, the Chief Personnel Officer (Cons.), S.E. Railway, Garden Reach, Kolkata. 4. Mr. Jasmieet Singh Bindra, the Chief Signal & Telecom Engineer (Cons.), S.E. Railway, Garden Reach, Kolkata. 5. Mr. Laxman Kumar, the Deputy Chief Signal & Telecom Engineer (Cons.), S.E. Railway, Adra Division, P.O. & P.S. Adra, West Bengal. 6. Mr. Manoj Pipal, Deputy Chief Signal & Telecom Engineer (Cons.), S.E. Railway, P.O. & P.S. Hatia, District-Ranchi. .......... Opp. Parties. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mrs. M.M. Pal, Sr. Advocate (Through V.C.). Mrs. Manjushree Patra, Advocate For the State : Mr. Chandan Tiwari, A.C. to G.A.-I For the UOI : Mr. Anil Kumar, A.S.G.I. Mr. Abhijeet Kumar Singh, C.G.C. ----- Order No.07 Date: 13.08.2025 1. A show-cause affidavit has been filed on behalf of the opposite parties which goes to indicate that all the benefits including the revised pension and other dues have been released in favour of the petitioner, thereby rendering the instant contempt case infructuous. 2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner would, however, submit that A.C. Pass has not been granted in favour of the petitioner. 3. That is a matter which is required to be considered by the opposite parties and such relief otherwise do not flow out from the judgment passed in the writ petition. 2025:JHHC:23431-DB 2 4. In the given circumstance, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the concerned authorities for grant of A.C. Pass and in case such request is made within a fortnight from today, the same shall be considered by the opposite parties within two weeks on receipt of such request and decide the same in accordance with law. 5. The present contempt case is disposed of as infructuous with the aforesaid liberty. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Sanjay/Rohit