Undru Naguru Meera Sayab v. Pothula Lakshmi Macharamma
SA/607/2003 · 2025-07-13
V Srinivas
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26701 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 26701 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010378222003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3367] MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V SRINIVAS SECOND APPEAL NO: 607 of 2003 Between: Undru Naguru Meera Sayab and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Pothula Lakshmi Macharamma and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. N (P) ANJANA DEVI SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. A KRISHNAM RAJU The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
On 06.08.2024 and 10.09.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not evincing any interest in prosecuting the appeal.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE V.SRINIVAS
Date: 14.07.2025 KNN