Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 267 (UTT)

SHAFEEQUE AHMAD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

SPLA/220/2025 · 2026-03-20

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

]SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS SPLA No.220 of 2025 With (Delay Condonation Appl. No.01 of 2025) In CRLA No.512 of 2025 Shafeeque Ahmad Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Vinay Bhatt, learned counsel for the Appellant. 2. Mr. N.S. Kanyal, learned AGA for the State. 3. As per office report 19.03.2026 notices has been served upon respondent nos.2, 3, 4 & 5 personally yet there is no representation. 4. Heard on delay condonation application. 5. There is delay of 23 days in filing the leave to appeal. 6. Delay is well explained. Delay is condoned. Accordingly, delay condonation application is allowed. 7. Leave is granted. 8. Trial Court Record has been received. 9. Registry is directed to prepare the paper book and supply the same to learned counsel for the parties, as per Rules. 10. Let the objection be filed by the State within two weeks. 11. List on 20.04.2026. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 20.03.2026 Arti