Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010243592025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3664/2025 MR REETAM SINGH S/O BALWANT SINGH AND VIJAYA LAXMI SINGH RESIDENT OF 3-B PROKASH ENCLAVE 9 HARABALA ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI ASSAM, 781007 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM ASSAM SACHIVALAYA DISPUR 781006 2:THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD GUWAHATI ASSAM 781001 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAMJUDICIAL DEPARTMENT E BLOCK 2ND FLOOR ASSAM SECRETARIATE DISPUR GUWAHATI 781001 4:BAR COUNCIL OF ASSAM NAGALAND MIZORAM ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND SIKKIMREPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN 2ND FLOOR GAUHATI HIGH COURT BUILDING MG ROAD GUWAHAT Linked Case : PIL/11/2024 REETAM SINGH S/O BALWANT SINGH AND VIJAYA LAXMI SINGH RESIDENT OF 3-B PROKASH ENCLAVE 9 HARABALA ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI ASSAM 781007
Page No.# 2/3 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF ASSAM ASSAM SACHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 2:THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR GENERAL MAHATMA GANDHI ROAD GUWAHATI ASSAM 781001 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT E BLOCK 2ND FLOOR ASSAM SECRETARIATE DISPUR GUWAHATI 781006 4:BAR COUNCIL OF ASSAM NAGALAND MIZORAM ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND SIKKIM REPRESENTED BY CHAIRMAN 2ND FLOOR GAUHATI HIGH COURT BUILDING MG ROAD GUWAHATI ASSAM 781001 ------------
or the applicant/ Petitioners : Mr. Reetam Singh, petitioner in person in PIL 11/2024 Mr. S. Chamaria, petitioner in Person in PIL 6/2024
For the respondents : Mr. G. Baishya, S.C., GHC Mr. H.K. Das, S.C., GHC
Page No.# 3/3 – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. ASHUTOSH KUMAR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY 17-11-2025 (Ashutosh Kumar, C.J.) PIL 11/2024 and PIL 6/2024 though dealing with distinct matters, have been tagged together. A prayer, therefore, has been made in I.A.(Civil) 3664/2025 to separate the afore-noted cases which are unnecessarily listed as analogous cases. Since both the afore-noted petitions deal with public interest litigation, it shall be heard by the same Bench, which is Division Bench-I. Thus, no order is required to be passed in the afore-noted interlocutory application. The interlocutory application is accordingly dismissed. Let the afore-noted PIL petitions come up for consideration on
21.01.2026.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant