Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9786 MFA No. 8032 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8032 OF 2012(MV-I) BETWEEN:
SALEEM, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O. MAHABOOB SAB, MASON, 5TH MAIN, MARLUR DINNE, TUMKUR-572 161. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ABDUL KHADAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MUSHTAQ AHMED, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. HASEENA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, W/O. MOHAMMED NOORULLA, OWNER OF AUTO RICKSHAW, MADEENA MOHALLA, KOTHI THOPE, TUMKUR-572163.
2.
BAJAJ ALLIANZ INSURANCE CO. LTD., BAGIC, KNV COMPLEX, 4TH CROSS, VIDHYANAGAR, B.H. ROAD, TUMKUR-572162.
REP. BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (R1-SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
BY SRI. P.S. RAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 08.12.2011 PASSED IN MVC.NO.325/2009 ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:9786 MFA No. 8032 of 2012
AND MACT-10, TUMKUR, DISMISSING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND ETC.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL JUDGMENT When the matter came up on 13.02.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Again, when the matter came up on 06.03.2025, there was no representation on behalf of both the parties. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.
2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested to pursue the matter.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is 'dismissed for non- prosecution’.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BN/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5