Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 26690 (DEL)

ZEESHAN KHAN v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

W.P.(CRL)/2452/2025 · 2025-08-08

Ajay Digpaul

Writ Petition (Criminal)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~57 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2452/2025 & CRL.M.A. 23118/2025 ZEESHAN KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Haneef Mohammad, Mr. K C Kaushik and Md. Maroof, Advs. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari ASC along with Mr. Arjit Sharma and Ms. Sakshi Jha, Advs. for State with HC Kuldeep Sharma, IO and SI Nitin, PS Jamia Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL O R D E R % 08.08.2025 1. The instant petition under Article 226/227 482 of the Constitution read with Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the petitioner praying for quashing of FIR 235/2025, dated 12.06.2025, registered at Police Station - Geeta Colony, Delhi for the offences punishable under Section 118(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the brief facts of the case are that a quarrel took place between the petitioner and the respondent no. 2 on 11.06.2025 where respondent no. 2 received injuries due to which the aforementioned FIR was registered. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2025 at 12:42:57 the petitioner and respondent no. 2 have now settled their disputes amicably and are now moving forward towards a peaceful and harmonious future. 4. It is prayed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that the instant FIR may be quashed on the basis of the compromise. 5. Learned APP for the State submitted that there is no opposition to the prayer made on behalf of the petitioner seeking quashing of the FIR in question in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 7. The petitioner is present before this Court and has been identified by his counsel and the Investigating Officer, Police Station Jamia Nagar. Respondent 2 is also present in the Court and has been identified by his counsel and the Investigating Officer. 8. On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 has categorically stated that he has entered into this compromise on his own free will and without any pressure. 9. Keeping in view the fact that the matter stands settled between the petitioner and the respondent no. 2 amicably without any pressure, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending. Affidavit of respondent no. 2, stating his no-objection to the quashing of the present FIR is also on record. Further, parties have undertaken to abide by all the terms of the compromise. 10. Hence, in light of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court passed in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab, (2012) 10 SCC 303, FIR 235/2025, dated 12.06.2025, registered at Police Station - Geeta Colony, Delhi for the offences punishable under Section 118(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2025 at 12:42:57 2023, and all the consequent proceedings emanating therefrom, are quashed. 11. The petition, along with pending applications, if any, stands disposed of. AJAY DIGPAUL, J AUGUST 8, 2025 Sk/ryp This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2025 at 12:42:57