Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2669 (GAU)

SRI PREETAM ROUT AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Crl.Pet./530/2025 · 2026-03-11

Shamima Jahan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010095022025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./530/2025 SRI PREETAM ROUT AND ANR S/O-SRI PINAK PANI ROUT,R/O-H.NO-10,DURGA MANDAP LANE,KAHILIPARA,COLONY BAZAR,GUWAHATI- 781018, ASSAM 2: SRI PARTHA SARATHI MALAKAR S/O-SRI MADHAB MALAKAR R.O-WARD NO.10 PUSPAKPUR P.O-MILANPUR P.S AND DIST-NALBARI ASSAM PIN-78133 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP. BY THE PP, GOVT. OF ASSAM 2:SMTI PUTALI KAKOTI W/O-MR. PRAKASH CH. KAKOTI R/O-H.NO.08 UDAYAN PATH NO.01 OPP. S.G. HOUSING COMPLEX TRIPURA ROAD JAYANAGAR BELTOLA GUWAHATI ASSAM-78102 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR D TALUKDAR, MD. S M RAHMAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR. S M BARUAH (R-2) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 12.03.2026 Heard Mr. D. Talukdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S. M. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State of Assam. Mr. Talukdar, learned counsel submits that the settlement has been reached between the parties in the instant case to the effect that the vehicle has been returned to the informant and the necessary consideration for the same has been paid to the petitioner. The said position is also accepted by Mr. S. M. Baruah, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. As such, the matter is closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant