APHC010378062000 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 14127/2000 Between: 1. G.BADRINARAYANA @ SWAMY, S/O. JAWARAHAR LAL, R/O. UD/LD-404, B-COLONY, V.T.P.S., IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, A.P., HYDERABAD. 2. THE DY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE A P GENCO, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDYUT SOUDHA, HYDERABAD. 4. THE A P GENCO, REP.BY IT'S CHIEF ENGINEER, V.T.P.S., IBRAHIMPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issues a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents 1 and 2 herein in submitting the report without hearing the petitioner, inspite of directions from this Hon'ble Court and the further action of the respondents 3&4 in not absorbing the petitioner in terms of B.P.Ms.No.37, dt.18.5.97 and B.P.Ms.No.272, dt.31.12.97 as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of the India and also violative of principles of natural justice 2 apart from contrary to the directions issued by this Hon'ble court and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2000(WPMP 17960 OF 2000 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 & 2 herein to enquire with regard to the eligibility of the petitioner in terms of the orders of this Hon'ble Court made in W.P.No.6118/98,dt.11.11.98 and submit the same to this Hon'ble Court pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such other order or orders in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 33758 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to modify the order dt. 12.12.2006 in W.P.No.14127 of 2000 by appropriately directing the respondents herein to consider my case for absorption in the light of the report No. 01/17876/02-II, dt. 14.2.2007 as prayed in the Writ Petition and to pass such other order or orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 4508 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents herein to consider the case of the petitioner for absorption/Regularization in the abolished category of Electrician by taking into consideration of report of the 1st and 2nd respondent and as prayed in WP No. 14127/2000 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave for filing of the counter affidavit in WP.No.14127 of 2000 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 3 2. E URMILA 3. M. VIDYASAGAR, ( STANDING COUNSEL FOR APGENCO ) 4. V SESHA KUMARI The Court made the following: ORDER: On 01.07.2024, 03.07.2025 and 31.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 28th August, 2025 RKS