APHC010006122008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] TUESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 358/2008 Between: Pentapati Rukmini and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND M/s Nischala Chit Fund P Ltd ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. ARAVALA RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. B K RAMESH BABU The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellants/defendants under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 26.12.2007 passed in A.S.No.130 of 2006 on the file of IX Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Guntur at Tenali, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 26.04.2006 passed in O.S.No.45 of 2003 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Tenali. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of either side. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 3. In the post lunch session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’ on payment of costs of Rs.500/- by the appellants, none appeared on their behalf. It seems that the appellants are not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date:11.02.2025 MS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.358 OF 2008 Date:11.02.2025 MS