Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010261362025
2025:GAU-AS:16296
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./1492/2025 SHOFIQUL HOQUE SON OF LATE MOHMOD ALI, R/O VILLAGE DIGHALIJAR,P.O. DIGHALIJAR, P.S. MURAJHAR DIST. HOJAI, ASSAM PIN-782439 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM 2:MD YASIN ALI CHOUDHURY S/O MAHMOD ALI CHOUDHURY R/O VILLAGE SAHARAN P.O. AND P.S. MURAJHAR DIST. HOJAI ASSAM PIN-78243 Advocate for the Petitioner : DARAK ULLAH, S BEGUM,MS A HUSSAIN,SABRISH AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
ORDER 28.11.2025 Heard Mr. S. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and also heard Mr. K.K. Parasar,
Page No.# 2/2 learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, appearing for the State respondent. This petition has been filed by invoking the inherent powers of this Court for quashing of the FIR, charge-sheet and the entire proceedings, in connection with PRC Case No.1643/2024 under Section 420/468/506 of the IPC in connection with Murajhar P.S. Case No.419/2019, pending before the Court of learned C.J.M., Hojai, Assam. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the FIR had been lodged by the informant on false allegation in as much as the petitioner did not use the legacy data of any other person. The FIR was lodged on 15.09.2019 and the case has been charge-sheeted on 31.10.2021. The case is now at the trial stage. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is now fixed on 12.01.2026. On pointed queries, the grounds on which the present application is sought to be premised on, does not inspire the confidence of this Court to interfere at the stage of trial in the present case. The grounds taken are with regard to the evidence, which could be produced by the accused before the learned Trial Court to prove his defence. Since the case is still at the stage of appearance, this Court does not deem it fit to interfere in the trial process. Accordingly, this criminal petition, being devoid of merit, is dismissed at the motion stage itself.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant